Paul's Heart

Life As A Dad, And A Survivor

Archive for the category “Politics”

20 Years In The Making


I have achieved many things in my life. I have survived many dire circumstances with my health. But there is one aspect of my life, that tops everything combined, being a Dad. And though March 14th is not a birth date, it became the date that would change who I was/am forever, the day I became a father.

Left unable to have biological children from side effects of my chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma back in 1988 (my radiation therapy gets a pass for this issue), and multiple failed attempts through fertility specialists, a decision had been made that if I were to ever become a father, it would be through adoption. While attending an information meeting on adoption, the influence from a newly adopted toddler named “Lily,” the decision was clear, adoption would by my only opportunity to become a dad. And “Lily” showed me it was meant to happen.

Adoption is a very difficult and serious decision to make, because in most cases, the adopting parents, and in some cases, a mother making a heartbreaking choice to place her child for adoption, are making a choice for someone who has no say in the matter. A child is born unto one parent, and then one day, is in the arms of another, likely never to see their birth parent(s) ever again.

There are two types of adoption, domestic and international. Though laws are fairly strict in the United States as far as adoption are concerned, there are chances that a birth mother could change her mind about the adoption, perhaps even years later. For this reason, and this reason alone, I did not want the heartache of having my child taken away from me, even if it was to return to the birth mother.

With “Lily”, I was introduced to the country of China, the last time I had heard about that country was as a senior in high school, so, a long time ago. My memory of what I learned back then came to the forefront, as China’s “one child” policy had resulted in the need to place many children into other families. And there were many families around the world, not just the United States who were more than happy to build their families partnering with China.

I was originally told to expect to travel March 17th, travel plans had been made. Then two weeks before travel, our date was moved up to March 13th. The adoption process had been halted for a number of months due to the SARS outbreak of 2004, and when international travel had opened again, news could not come soon enough that we would be travelling. Moving up the date made it even sooner.

This is an actual picture from the window of the flight that was taking me to my daughter. Upon landing in Hong Kong, all of us traveling were given even greater news.

Thinking there would be a couple of days before we would all get to meet our children, we were informed to get a good night’s sleep, as we begin the adoption process the next morning, meeting our children, and returning to our hotel with our new family members.

The date was March 14th, 2004. There are many things in Chinese culture that are considered lucky or fortuitous, the color red, lady bugs, and something called “the red thread.” This “thread” is actually imaginary but carries one of the most meaningful connections between those who “hold” that “thread”. And though that “thread” will grow and stretch, it will never break. March 14th already was special to me, my late grandfather’s birthday.

From that morning on, my life changed, taking on a whole new meaning, a whole new purpose. Every decision that I would make was now because someone else was counting on me. To refer to parenting as an “experiment,” is an understatement as I grew up without the typical “nuclear” family, the only thing I knew about fatherhood, was what I would have liked to have and did not, as my parents divorced when I was three years old. My only examples of parenthood came from school friends when I would visit their homes.

But when my oldest daughter was placed in my arms, I never gave another thought to what I missed out on, nor what I saw my friends have. The bond between father and child began at that moment for me, instantaneously. While there is a clear difference between giving birth to become a parent, and through adoption, the emotions of that moment where it begins are the same. It took no time at all for me to want to bring a sister into my daughter’s life.

And that moment came almost two years later. With two daughters, I officially became a “girl dad.” And I was the happiest man on the planet. I felt a purpose, a responsibility, every decision that I made in my life, would have either rewards or consequences that would impact my daughters. There was pressure to make sure as they grew up, that they would learn everything they needed to be a responsible and respectable adult. Priorities were morals and manners, of course schooling, responsibilities and decision making, all the while, being a kid. It is said that 90% of our time together, will be before our children turn 18 years old. And boy did I want to make that time count.

Unfortunately, divorce changed the track a bit, but I did everything I could to stick to the original plan. And unlike my childhood where I barely saw my father, technology made it possible for me to stay in contact with them as much as I was able to do so.

And now, here we are, 20 years later. Both of my daughters are in college, independent of their parents, making their own decisions, with so many more to come. But instead of being in the guidance position, I am now in the advisor role. My daughters face decisions and come to me for assistance as needed, things that I may see that they do not.

My health issues have been well documented on this blog, and during their childhoods, my daughters have been through all of them. They are just now learning about my cancer past which gives them understanding why I have the health maladies that I do. But for me, these 20 years have given me meaning, purpose, drive. With the things that I deal with, these years are not guaranteed by any means. However, I want more, many more years, many more experiences. And my daughters are the reason I will continue to fight for those years and my health. I could not imagine where I would be today without them.

Debunking Three Myths


Up until a couple of years ago, there was a popular game that teens played among each other, as my daughters often challenged me to the game. It was an interesting concept, though I disagree with the one premise, the game did provide something valuable, an opportunity to learn about an each other. It was called “two truths and a lie.” This game is considered an “ice breaker” or conversation starter, and found not only in schools, but also in media such as Parade Magazine, even the Ellen DeGeneres show. You simply state three things, but two of those must be the truth, and the third must be a lie.

As a parent, I thought I had a pretty good edge with my daughters in this game, clearly knowing more about them than they themselves. It turns out that they were pretty good at finding things to tell me that I might be unaware of, one of the favorite topics, food choices. My youngest daughter was real good at getting me on that one.

So with that explanation, these are two of my truths, and one of the myths (I prefer to use myth as opposed to a lie because this is not something I say or believe, but rather what others believe.

  1. I love to attract drama.
  2. I am a shy person.
  3. I am a private person.

Now if you have followed “Paul’s Heart” long enough, it might actually be difficult to tell. But the fact is, two of these things are actually true about me, while the third, is more of a manifestation or a means for someone to justify how they feel about me as a person.

This first one really baffles me.

I have been told by a few people, that I “love to attract drama.” While I have had my share of intense events in my life, I certainly have never gone looking for them. When I ask for examples of the drama they refer to, I hear crickets chirp. I guess they must be comparing their lives to mine as far as things going on. They must be fortunate not to have anything nipping at their heels constantly. And for that, they feel I must go looking for trouble. I don’t.

I will admit however, that I have an unusually calm demeanor in dealing with crisis after crisis. But do I go looking for drama? Absolutely not. This is just one misconception that some people have expressed to me. I can say for certain, that when I face a crisis, I have a defense mechanism that kicks in, removing all emotions, allowing me to think rationally, recognizing that any kind of escalation in my emotions would likely make the situation worse. And so, I do not make it worse. I simply give myself time to think things out clearly and with direction. Ironically, I am a horrible chess player, but in life, I am able to think several steps ahead. But I definitely do not need to add anything more to my schedule demanding more attention of me.

I really do consider myself a shy person. Merriam-Webster defines “shy” as “timid, tendency to avoid, hesitant, or reserved.” Though I express myself through writing, speaking, and other performances, it is the individual one-on-one conversations that I can struggle with.

Through my school days, I kept to myself, often intimidated by the friendships that others had amongst themselves. Constantly moving during my school days did not help me to establish new friendships, only to move again as soon as I would finally get comfortable. As a co-worker, after some time and effort, I found myself being able to interact with moderate comfort. But really? Anywhere that I had a boundary, physical or mental, between me and someone else, is when I felt my most confident and functional. That became obvious as a radio disc jockey in my younger days, in a closed soundproofed room, broadcasting on the radio, no one looking directly at me. Recently, I had a former classmate call me out on social media following a post response which I considered quite neutral and factual, them stating aggressively and actually quite meanly, that I was still the same as I was in high school, still a “&(%*%” (fill in with any derogatory remark). Before I blocked any further access to me from them, I did make sure that those on that particular page were aware, that while I recognized the name, I never knew this person. I literally basically “hung” with maybe a handful of close friends in school. This person and I had never crossed paths because I was so shy.

But my biggest challenge came when I decided to run for a public office, our local school board. I did not prepare myself mentally, that campaigning was more than just saying “I’m running for school board.” I knew that I would have to give speeches, which I was okay with, because there would be separation between me and the audience. My problem came, when my campaign wanted me to attend “meet and greets” (candidates get the chance to mingle among the voters individually), and I was petrified. As a slate of five candidates, running for the five open slots against the five incumbents, I felt invincible. I had others behind me able to bail me out of any situation that I was getting boxed into. Not being a “politician”, I was not prepared for stumbling blocks that could be thrown at me. While I am a big “eye contact” person when I talk to someone, I found this to be a big problem when the eye contact was not returned.

After all of the speeches I have given, articles and stories that I have written, and other performances, I know that I can handle myself in public situations, but I still consider myself a shy person. This is a major challenge for someone trying to promote a book.

I am actually a very private person. I can hear the “I call bullshit” on this one from many. But I really am a private person, or at least, I want to be. And up until my diagnosis of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, I definitely can affirm that I was a private person. There is one thing that prevents me from that privacy that I make the choice to live by. 

When I finished my treatments, I promised myself that I wanted to give back for the gift of life that I had been given. But as many cancer survivors know, because of treatments, I do not have the option of some of the more popular things I could do, such as give blood or donate organs. I wanted to help. I wanted to inspire. I want to give hope. To do this, that means I have to “share” my experiences, and if you have followed “Paul’s Heart” long enough, I am really quite transparent, some times to my own detriment. This advocacy that flows through my blood, would branch out to other issues such as patient care, cancer survivorship, adoption, public education, and of course, divorce related issues in regard to children. If I were not in the position I am in today, I would definitely prefer to going back to being a private person.

I am going to throw in a bonus truth. In spite of all of the difficult things that I have faced in my life, and continue to deal with, I really am a positive person. Sure, my cancer history, my divorces, and several other things that I have faced, are quite the downers. But I persevere. I come through every time, because I believe I will. All too often, many have counted me out, actually, they depended on me tapping out and quitting. But I don’t. Yes, I have many health issues that consume my attention. Of course, I missed being with my daughters during the divorce period as much as I was prior to the divorce. There are many things that I deal with as an advocate, and yes, they are difficult. But that does not make me a negative person because I make a choice, to deal with everything head on and to support others. I truly believe that things work out the way that they are intended to work out. And as long as I wake up tomorrow to do it all again, that sounds pretty positive to me.

35 Years Ago – Where It All Began


November 17th, 1988. I recognize many anniversaries, this is one that I call a “dark” anniversary. In fact, it is one of my top 2 darkest anniversaries. Though the weeks before, doctors had suspected, while I fought and denied their opinions, the week before Thanksgiving, I was officially diagnosed with Hodgkin’s Disease, now referred to as “lymphoma.” With all due respect to Willy Shakespeare, and “a rose by any other name is still a rose,” cancer is still cancer whether you call it a disease or lymphoma, lipstick on a pig, is still a pig, just with lipstick.

As I completed and proofread my first ever solo project, a book titled, “Paul’s Heart – Life As A Dad And A 35-Year Cancer Survivor” (available on Amazon December 19, 2023), the details of this particular time period, I found were as clear today as they were thirty-five years ago. Pretty amazing, considering just last night I got home from the grocery store, went inside the house, only to be told I left the groceries in the trunk of my car. But that is a post for another day.

Thirty-five years is a lot to remember. But the most amazing thing about surviving Hodgkin’s Lymphoma all these years, is remembering how it was handled back then, and seeing progress towards better diagnostics and safer treatments and care today.

I know many other survivors, all over the world, who are “older” than me. “Older” is in quotes, because it does not necessarily refer to chronological age, but years in survivorship. Imagine, if you think thirty-five years is a lot, I personally know many survivors who are forty and over fifty years out in remission! And not just in the United States, but around the world!

While all the details are in the book, here is the short version where I came from back in 1988. Again, keeping in mind, the things that were done to me, were newer methods compared to those who were treated before me.

The diagnostic methods, and again, I won’t bog you down with the actual descriptions of each, just know that these things that were done to me, were invasive, extreme, painful, and some, now considered obsolete.

  • the original biopsy
  • x-rays and CT scans
  • lymphangiogram (a procedure to light up the lymph system, involving surgery to both feet)
  • laparotomy (spleen removal and abdominal lymph node biopsies, liver biopsy)
  • bone marrow biopsy

Today the standard used in diagnosis and staging of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma is the PET scan, positron emission topography. I have no idea what this even is, so I won’t try to explain it. All I know is that it is much easier than what I was put through, definitely more efficient and with Hodgkin’s chances of remission dependent on time, the PET scan definitely saves time.

Of, course, then there are the treatments. It is worth repeating, that those treated before me, were treated with much more toxic chemicals and higher doses of radiation. In reality, my treatments were toxic and harsh enough.

  • high dose radiation, 4000 rads (or centigrey) – if you are unfamiliar with how bad this is, simply ask a radiation tech or someone who works in the nuclear field.
  • chemotherapy cocktail consisting of chemicals used in chemical warfare to name a few.

This combined treatment plan is what has given me thirty-three years, Hodgkin’s free. Today, radiation is more targeted, lower amounts used with what is called proton radiation. Again, this is out of my lane and all too sciency and I would probably lose myself in the weeds explaining it. Chemotherapy has also changed dramatically, having now eliminated some of the drugs given to me, and adjusting the remaining drugs to more tolerable and safer amounts. As always, there are clinical trials constantly being studied for something better and safer.

One thing that has not changed over the decades, conversation from the oncologist, stating the one thing every cancer patient wants to hear, “five year survival rate.” We take this literally as all we have to do, is make it to five years remission, and we are good to go, forever. And if you did your math, for me, that was twenty-eight years ago, and I am still here. So why do I spend so much time writing and advocating for Hodgkin’s patients and survivors? Because in spite of better diagnostics and treatments, and continued high remission rates, there is one area that has not improved hardly at all, and that pertains to quality of “survivorship.”

Back in the early days, medicine knew that it was likely treatments had a decent chance of killing their patients because it was so toxic. But with the risk of dying from the cancer itself, you still had to try. And if you got through your treatments, “hurray!” It was more about the celebration of getting through the treatments, than the remission itself. However, if you were able to get to that five year remission mark, which coincidentally is all that science had studied as far as side effects, short term or long term, you were left on your own. And what cancer patient does not want to put their cancer past behind them? Just walk away from their oncologist and never utter another word about cancer.

There is a huge difference in telling a ten-year old and a seventy-six year old about a “five-year survival rate.” A senior is not going to be all obsessed about living a natural long life at that age as would a teenager or young adult. Which means only one thing, the younger you are, there is a very good chance to develop what is referred to as “late term side effects” or late developing side effects. The problem, these late effects were never studied or researched. In fact, as time would go on, even in my time, health problems would occur, that did not make sense for someone a certain age, and no explanation why. In fact, until the internet came along, is only when “word of mouth” came along, and survivors started sharing similar stories, and correlations made sense. And then some of us would actually be fortunate enough, to find a doctor who actually had been studying these issues, not common in modern medicine.

This is how “Paul’s Heart” came to be. With more than a dozen diagnosis of late effects, all tied to my cancer treatments, I learned of the right people, fellow survivors, and found the right medical care to help me reach thirty-three years of survivorship. So, all is good right? Not really.

Research documented in JAMA, states that survivors of childhood cancer, such as Hodgkin’s, are 95% likely to develop a “significant health problem” by the age of forty-five. Now again, I want to state, cancer patients to this day, are still being told the “five year cure rate,” and then being left on their own to decide their care. So researchers are aware of this need to follow up cancer survivors passed five years, but why aren’t doctors doing it? And why, when the correlation to cancer treatments for a particular issue, do survivors all too often hear denial of such correlation from their doctors when the patient brings the possibility to their attention? Why is this important surveillance need not being passed on and mandated to the doctors from those who researched it and is even recognized by the NIH (National Institute Of Health)?

A common discussion that takes place among my fellow survivors comes up every now and then, is how we are told how our bodies actually are older than chronologically dated. The NCI (National Cancer Institute) funded a large study of childhood cancer survivors treated in the last quarter of the last century. They found cognitive issues as well as an artificial increase in aging, making the bodies of long term cancer survivors appear 10, 20, or thirty years older than what actually are. Combine that with the progressive damaging side effects from our treatments, and our mortality is shortened quite a bit. Again, the NCI is a major institution in medicine and they are aware of this. Why are doctors not treating survivors appropriately with this knowledge that is available? Why are cancer patients not given any follow up plan, for the rest of their lives, after that last drop of chemotherapy has entered their veins? After thirty-three years, why am I still asking that question? After fifty years, my fellow survivors want to know, why aren’t they able to get the help medicine knows is needed and why are newer survivors just “kicked to the curb?” Fellow survivors involved in various social media pages are well aware of this, why aren’t all doctors?

The American Cancer Society barely recognizes any other cancers than the big one other than honorable mentions. And they certainly do not focus on cancer survivorship, again, because all the focus is on five years. What about after five years?

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which actually has the word “lymphoma” in its name, while recently has posted information on survivorship on its website, albeit somewhat difficult to find, I feel does not address the issue of long term survivorship and the various health issues faced by survivors frequently enough.

If you recall in the beginning, I talked about “progress.” Well, sometimes that progress has to come from within. I mentioned the value of communications among long term survivors across social media. Several years ago, an organization was started, and founded, all by Hodgkin’s Lymphoma survivors. It is called, Hodgkin’s International.

Here is their mission stated on their cover page, “Hodgkin’s International is a non-profit (501c3) organization dedicated to improving the quality of life for Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors. Our goal is to connect survivors with one another and to provide them with essential information about the Late Effects they may face as a result of earlier treatments. We also seek to promote education and medical research in the area of survivorship, foster a better understanding of the particular needs of long term survivors, and to advocate for the interests of Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors around the world.”

On HI’s website, survivors and patients of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, at any stage, can find personal stories, valuable and certified medical resources of information necessary to treatments and survivorship including medical concerns to look out for based on treatments, news and events, and even offer a monthly newsletter usually with an announcement to a monthly video conference with a variety of topics. To put it bluntly, this organization has finally given the opportunity and support for others not just to make sense of the things their bodies are experiencing long after treatment, but more importantly to let them know, they, we, are not alone.

There is still so much more that needs to be, and can be done. I still would like to see in my lifetime, a completely safe treatment for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. I would still like to see a mandated follow up plan, listing the potential side effects (as they do on vaccine warnings), establish a communication network between all the doctors involved in the care of the patient, led by a primary care physician. Not to be forgotten, mental health also takes a beating in survivorship, and I usually commit a post to that alone. At least Hodgkin’s International is leading the way to a better quality of life for those of us in the Hodgkin’s world of survivorship.

Don’t get me wrong. While I dread this time of year, every year because of the flashbacks I still have, I am forever grateful to all who got me to Novermber 17th, 2023 from the beginning to today. I am forever grateful that I have had the chance to share so many memories with my daughters.

Many will say that they do not let Hodgkin’s define them, and I do concur. But surviving Hodgkin’s has made me the advocate for others that I am today.

Post Navigation