Using Keyboard Medicine As A Crystal Ball

Ah, the good old days when you saw the doctor, they told you what was wrong, told you what they would do to make you better, and with everything worked out, you would live happily ever after. But over the decades, things have changed dramatically, for the best or the worst, depends on the individual situation.
As an addition to the “21st Century Cures Act” of 2016 which was meant to speed up medical research and treatment approval, in April of 2021, an addition was made to this law, requiring every health care provider to give patients access to their electronic records, immediately, rapidly, and completely. Oh, and free of charge. As a cancer survivor, I cannot tell you how many hundreds of dollars I once had to pay just to get copies of my medical records, my records, about me. I was already paying the doctor, why should I have had to pay for my records?
I would guess that doctors did not like the patient getting a preview of their records before the doctor could talk to them, for any number of reasons, mostly, the patient would jump the gun on diagnosis, and quite possibly stall treatment while arguing from a position the patient knows nothing about, wasting time. There is also wasting time, with distracting research and diagnosis that keyboard doctors find as they find out things on their own and then argue with their doctors. And did I mention, the frustrations of waiting to hear back from the doctors when even they have the information at their fingertips?
In 1996, HIPPA gave patients the legal right to get their records which of course takes time, effort, and money. But the records being digital today, these records are literally at our fingertips. And it is a known factor, that this convenience, does have its benefits. Patients can be better prepared for their appointments having the information ahead of time. A lot of time is wasted dealing with the emotional shock of a serious diagnosis, so if they can get that out of their system prior to the appointment, the doctor can deal with the issue at hand. And then of course, patients can potentially rid themselves of any anxiety waiting for the doctor to call them, sometimes up to two weeks or more.
But how the information gets used as a patient can also have its downside. For instance, a question came across my feed, “from what I have been reading, the typical lifespan of someone with congestive heart failure is 5 years. What are your experiences?” was posted to the social media page.
First, DAMN! I hope it is not five years! I am “living” with congestive heart failure myself, one of my many late side effects from my cancer treatments over 37 years ago. Fortunately, back then, I could not Google research on longevity for my cancer survivorship. But this poster put the question out there. As I mentioned, I am in CHF, and have been since 2021. That makes me at five years right now. I guess I need to make sure my ducks are all in a row at this point. Or… as the other 200 replies he got, basically saying the same thing, stay off Google, and then sharing their inspirational results, 10 years, 25 years, and more, living with CHF and the various activities they still enjoy, including running a marathon.
You see, the problem with making a blanket statement like “how long do people live with…”, one of the reasons statistics are so complicated, they do not take all the mitigating factors into consideration, especially when it comes to the individual patient and their history.
As I often do, I will use myself as an example, even though exposing myself publicly like this with my history some would not consider wise, I sacrifice that, because my purpose in survivorship at this point, is to make a difference to others. And so, I am as transparent as I can be.
As I said, I have been in CHF for five years now. And my past is definitely complicated due to the treatments (high dose radiation and toxic chemo) for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma 37 years ago. For the purposes of time, I won’t list all the potential issues or body systems that can have an impact on CHF, but just listing my heart history by itself, should seem daunting enough:
- double bypass of the LAD following a “widow maker” level blockage
- stent of the RCA after blockage of 90%
- TAVR replacement of aortic valve
- Left bundle branch block
- Damage to the mitral valve
- Well pronounced murmur
- Ejection fraction of 40%
- Myocardial ischemia
- and of course, my diagnosis of CHF
As you can see, my heart is a mess. So if I were to take that poster’s question literally, I don’t have much time left. Now compared to someone who has no other issues with their heart, just CHF, of course, their survival is going to be less complicated, and hence live longer. I mean, is the patient smoking and drinking, eating healthy, living as stress-free as possible, exercising? And of course, do they have their own “other” health issues that could complicate their survival? That is why a blanket statement as fact, just does not work, and is actually harmful.
This is the danger of keyboard medicine, for as good as it can do, it can put the unwarranted fear into someone, who should really get their information and data from those who know, their doctors. Putting your trust in a digital crystal ball is dangerous and will also rob you of quality time you do have, until told otherwise. I know that I have more time than five years, and I am counting on many more.
I am a major believer and supporter of this medical transparency. It really is just a matter of how you use it, and how much time you obsess over the information. For me, I do not use it for the purposes of how long I may have, but rather as a reminder to appreciate everything that I have gone through.


