Paul's Heart

Life As A Dad, And A Survivor

Archive for the category “Education”

Co-parents Who Get It


coparenting4

Divorce is never going to be easy.  Two normal people do not get married with the intention of getting divorced.  But circumstances happen, situations change.  The inability to deal with those changes are normally what will lead to the divorce.  And if the process of divorce were perfect, in other words, both spouses were willing to talk rationally, responsibly, and honestly, throughout the process, then of course, there probably would not have been any need for the divorce if they already possessed this ability to communicate.  And when it is one spouse against another, the pitch of conversations is commonly tame, than when children are involved with the divorce process.

coparenting3

But why should a couple without children, work through a divorce differently, than a couple who has children?  I mean, besides the obvious, the children.  Both spouses will have to discuss assets.  And in theory, take the children out of the equation, those same parents would be in the same situation as the non-children couple.  What is it, that triggers a spouse, in a divorce to react in a more extreme manner for revenge (no matter what caused the marriage to fail)?  If the marriage failed because of money – a couple without children will settle the divorce even with a bitter spouse.  But with children, no matter the reason for the divorce, a spouse would be expected to be bitter, yet the non-children couple will not seek the revenge that a couple dealing with custody issues would face.  What is it exactly about children in a marriage that allows, promotes, and encourages a parent in the middle of a divorce to believe that divorcing a spouse means you divorce your children, also referred to as parental alienation?

coparenting5

We can all agree, that recipient of divorce papers would be considered normal, if they were upset.  One person finally has enough of a situation, and reluctantly files for divorce, may not have the level of emotion being dealt with by the spouse who received the divorce papers.  And in time, those feelings under normal circumstances will subside.  No, the pain does not go away, but it should not escalate.  Spouses without children, potentially have no reason to ever see or hear of each other again.  Parents will see each other for the rest of their lives.

A divorce is just that, between spouses.  But parents do not divorce.  But there is an extra step or two involved in the divorce process, that in the perfect world should not be necessary.  Parents do not divorce.  Mother will always be mother, and Father will always be father.  Both are equal and should have equal time, should still maintain a unified goal with the schooling, faith building, protection, and of course, memory sharing.

coparenting2

When one parent has the child (or children), unless it is a special event (such as confirmation, graduation), the parent not having time with the child, clearly will lose opportunities for memories.  There are likelihoods that birthdays will be missed, school functions, extracurricular events, and other achievements will be missed by at least one parent.

I chose to write this post after seeing a Facebook post by someone that I know personally.  She had gone through a divorce in recent years.  I do not know the particulars as to what caused the divorce, nor is it any of my business.  But there are ties between our families that leave me with an interest with the children.  But I saw a photo posted, not one that was taken by the parent without the custody of the child, but by the parent had the current custody of the child, and actually shared it with the other parent.  This is not the first time I have seen this.  I have a friend locally who also lives quite a distance from his children, and he also gets photos of his children, when he is not able to be with them.

I know nothing of their custody agreements, and I will not speak personally about mine.  But if you look at a typical custody agreement, other than the actual visitations, there are clauses that just seem plain sad, that often need to be put on paper, but clearly do not belong.

coparenting1

What does it say to a parent, about a parent, that it needs to be put in writing, to:

*  share photos

*  make sure the other parent is included in medical decisions

*  involve the other parent in educational evaluations and issues

*  allow uninhibited communications between children and both parents

*  prevent a hostile environment towards the other parent, especially by others

Seriously, what is it about children in the divorce process, that makes them a part of the process?  Look at the above “recommendations.”  To see them on paper is inflammatory, and they are implied by the very system that claims to want to protect the rights of the children.  If you have to have these written into an agreement, then clearly, you suspect there is going to be a problem with one parent complying.  And instead of dealing with that as the issue, the ability to co-parent willingly, the child often will get caught in the tug-of-war between one parent who just wants to co-parent, and the other parent who only wants to get even for filing for the divorce.  The crazy thing is, there is no reason ever, for seeking revenge for filing for divorce, especially at the expense of a child.  If you dig deep for the root cause, there will almost always be a mutual cause, whether or not the other spouse acknowledges it is the issue.  And it has nothing to do with the children.  Why make it their problem?

There will always be a “cheering” section giving their “professional advice.”  And because they may be closer to the vengeful parent, that parent will clearly believe what they are saying, because it is being reinforced, that they are doing the right thing.  But that gallery also has no interest in what is best for the children.  They are only on the side of revenge-seeking spouse.  And their comments will only be directed as such.

Children have no role in the divorce process itself.  To keep a child from a parent for no reason or cause between that child and the parent, is called alienation.  Parental alienation is child abuse.  It is time that is taken away from not only the parent affected, but more importantly, the child who is almost never given a voice, will grow up devastated.  And that time can never be replaced.

coparenting6

When you are divorced, you no longer have to be husband and wife.  But if you have children between you, you still have to be the mother and the father.  And no one outside of the immediate family, the children and the mother and father should have anything to say about it.

Cancer Survivor Day 2015


11140338_1023832694308529_457527836403710987_n

My name is Paul Edelman.  And I am the author of “Paul’s Heart”.  I am a 25 year survivor of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, a form of blood cancer.

June 7, 2015 is National Cancer Survivor Day.

survivor2

If you are reading this, not only do you know of one cancer survivor, me, but I am willing to bet, that you know many more cancer survivors.  Back when I was diagnosed, it was difficult, let me correct that, I never heard of National Cancer Survivor Day.

survivor3

Today, there are well over 12,000,000 cancer survivors just in the United States alone.  Cancer survivors are a special group of people.  Not only do they survive a once definite death sentence, but their presence now also contributes to better cures, and better follow up care, so that one day, not only a cure can be found for everyone, but perhaps even prevention.  And I do believe in my lifetime I will see this day come.

survivor1

Please, today, whether it be on Facebook, Twitter, or any other social media, please give a shout out to cancer survivors you personally know.  I literally have met over a thousand survivors over my 25 years, and I could not possibly name all of them on this blog without forgetting a name.  But two that immediate come to mind that I definitely want to wish a Happy Cancer Survivor Day to, are both subject of prior posts on my blog.

Stephanie, every day I see yet another huge leap in the battle against cancer with you.  You are an inspiration to me because I know what you have gone through to get to this point in just a few short years.  You will touch so many lives in your care of patients, perhaps some who have developed issues related to their cancer treatments themselves and because of your history, you will have a completely different perspective with patient relationships.

And Jeff, it is bad enough that we have to go through this shit once.  But yet again, you have been challenged.  You have dedicated your life to fighting against Lymphoma, and the cruelest of ironies, you are battling it yet again.  As I write this post, I know you are on the upswing from your transplant.  Please know, that no one is pulling harder for you, than to someday soon, here those words again, “you are in remission.”

To everyone else, whether it is weeks since you completed treatments, or decades, today is an important day for all of us.  I wish you all well.

Screenshot_2014-12-26-12-30-08 Paul Edelman

2 Parents…3 Parents…4 Parents


I was just a toddler when my parents divorced.  I knew back then as I recall today, I recognized that I only had one mother and one father.  Divorce was still fairly common back in the 1960’s through the 1970’s but what often was not really talked about was “step parenting.”

step2

While definitely one of the most popular examples of a “step parent” situation, the television show never really emphasized the roles, though clearly all six children called the parents “mom” and “dad”.  I make this observation, because while we know that the father was a widower, the status of the mother’s prior spouse (her full name was Carol Tyler Martin Brady – Martin was her former married name) was never addressed.  She was supposed to have been divorced, but because of the times, divorce was too risky to talk about.  Yes, it was too risky to talk about divorce, but in the meantime, over on another network, a bigoted male cheauvenist pig by the name of Archie Bunker was bringing in huge ratings for “All In The Family.”

step3

The most blatant reference though, and creating the biggest stereotype, came from Walt Disney’s “Cinderella” fairy tale.  In every version of this story, Cinderella is treated poorly by a “wicked” stepmother (and step sisters also, but that is another post).

Step parenting is not a bad thing in concept really.  But it is a challenge from all aspects, the child, each spouse, and of course, the “step”.  Undoubtedly, my children will some day find themselves dealing with a “step parent.”  But just as my experience as a child of a divorce gives me first hand knowledge of the emotions and pains a child feels through a divorce, I also have first hand experience in dealing with not just one step parent, but two, a step mother and a step father.

When my children were first told of the divorce, they were 8 and 10 years of age.  I kept the explanation for their level and most certainly made sure that they would never feel that they were any part of the divorce, especially the cause, because they were not.  The explanation was that Mr. & Mrs. Edelman, were no longer going to be husband and wife and that was all.  Their mother was going to remain their mother, and I was going to remain their one and only father.  It was definitely going to be in different houses, but both would offer them the only love that they had ever known.  That would not change.

But of course, my older daughter, always being the inquisitive one, wasted no time in wanting to talk about “step parents”.  She was aware that I had both a step mother and a step father.  And so my explanation went as followed.  That a step parent is “one step away from being the legal parent”.  The step parent takes on the responsibility of helping the other parents, and I emphasize all parents involved in the child’s life.  Some may try to pull the role to that of simply financially supporting the child, but nothing could be farther from the truth.  Of course, there are rules and boundaries that will exist between step parent and step child and these must be recognized and respected for the relationship to not only work, but to grow.

step1

A step parent who takes the “heavy handed” approach risks negative response from a child who will have no problem saying, “you’re not my real parent”.  And the hostility between will begin to grow.  But a step parent who understands and respects that the child has the right to love and cherish their legal parent, will have a lifetime of respect from that child.

As I mentioned earlier, “parent” is a title that a child uses to distinguished familial structure.  And clearly, while a step parent may be introduced as a step parent, I do not believe I ever called either of my “steps” step mom or step dad to their face.  I called both by their first name.  Neither was my legal parent, and just as I assured my daughters that their mother was going to remain their mother, and I their father, I was not going to refer to either other than by their first names.

The Brady Bunch creates a very interesting scenario however.  Because while I will strongly state, that my children will only call me their father, I say this because I will NEVER surrender my parental rights.  I will be their only father.  Mike Brady was a widower when he married Carol.  And when he married Carol, he made it clear to all of his sons, that she was not going to replace their deceased mother.  But this was a complete absence of the mother.  The mother was never going to exist again.  So, if the boys decided that they wanted to call Carol “mom”, I was okay with that.  But when a parent still exists, the child should still call their legal parent either “mom” or “dad”, and no one else.  This was never addressed for the daughters and Carol because of the network refusing to acknowledge the divorce.  I am certain, that if the television show would have been shown today, the issue of whether the boys would call her Carol or “mom.”

As my soon to be ex and I will most likely move on in our lives, our daughters will most likely face this situation one day.  And while we will both remain their parents, we owe our daughters to respect their rights to be able to call the only parents they know, by the only title they have ever known, “Mom” and “Dad.”  Sure, questions will come as I have already been asked what it was like having a step parent, did I like them, etc.  But both of us as parents need to make sure that if there is any “step” involved, that the rights and expectations of the legal parents are not undermined.  All “parents” involved need to remain on the same page, otherwise risk being put between each other by the child, which is bad enough when a child does it between two parents, let alone three, or four.  And just as it is critical for a parent not to belittle the former spouse, so it goes with the “step parent.”

Our daughters have only one mother, and one father.  And that is the way it will be forever.  But as the Brady’s pointed out, step parents can also be a good thing.

Post Navigation