Paul's Heart

Life As A Dad, And A Survivor

Archive for the category “Adoption”

Happy Father’s Day


fathers day

I would like to wish all the dads reading “Paul’s Heart” a Happy Father’s Day.  And at the same time, I would like to wish all the moms having to fill both roles, a Happy Parent’s Day as well.

DSC03176

Father’s Day has always been special to me.  From the first day that I held each daughter in my arms, I knew that I was blessed to have such beautiful, kind, and loving children.  They are constantly in my thoughts and in my dreams.  Half of their childhood has gone by already, and so quickly too.

20131109_200245

Together, we have experienced so much already.  You came to me with so much love from a land on the other side of the world.  You pulled me through emergencies that none of us had expected, but for certain, if it were not for you, I could have easily given up.  My doctor’s goal is a simple one, in spite of everything my body is dealing with, he plans on making sure that I see you graduate, get married (if you so choose), and to be a grandfather (I will hope).  So far, he has gotten me 1/3 of the way there.

I love both of you so much Madison and Emmalie.  And I always will.

att_1406000512661186

Daddy.

Just Inconsiderate? Or Child Abuse?


car4

If you are reading this post, I would certainly hope not.

car2

If you are reading this post, I would certainly hope this offends you.

car1

Only until the turn of the century has attention been paid to this issue.  Admittedly, some of us who are a little “long in the tooth”, recall days of riding in the backs of pick-up trucks, sitting in the old station wagon in the back seat which faced the rear of the car, and of course, riding in the front seat with no seat belt on.  There are many who would argue, “we turned out alright, right?”  Sure we did.  But times have changed in regard to traffic and relying on other people’s driving skills.

car3

But one thing that unfortunately still exists, and as I witnessed recently, is an adult smoking in a car with a child in it.  Now while the age of the child should not make a difference, admittedly I was more enraged because the child was a toddler.  Sure, back in the 1960’s and 1970’s my parents (all 4 of them – I had two step parents), smoked while I was in the car.  I did not like the smell of it, but I was just a kid.  My opinion did not matter.

But something happened once we entered into the new millennium.

car6

As it became more and more apparent as to the dangers of second hand smoke, finally the concern for children was being raised by some lawmakers, which was not coming from the parents by the way.  But think about it, and this is not a lecture for someone who wants to smoke, but we can all agree, smoking causes cancer and other awful end-of-life issues.  And those who smoke, chose to begin willingly.  As for being able to stop “any time they want”, well the tobacco companies and lobbyists have done their best to make sure that smokers do not stop.  And with the popularity of vaping increasing, even amongst “new” smokers who simply took up electronic cigarettes because they have been lied to that e-cigs are not as dangerous, again more lies.  But bottom line, adults make the choice.  And as an adult, I can make the choice if I want to stand in the direction of second hand smoke or not, or be in a vehicle when someone is smoking.  A child cannot.  A child is never given the chance to say, “no”.

A child in the back seat of a car has NEVER made the choice that it wants to be subjected to second hand smoke, or begin their first risk towards lung cancer and heart disease.  But the fact is, in spite of knowing everything we know about second hand smoke, and as much as a parent may claim to love their child, some love their cigarettes more.

car5

If someone spanked a child, society would be in an uproar yelling “child abuse”.  And not to take it lightly, under normal circumstances, a spanking might just leave a minor red mark on the buttocks.  But why is it that we do not charge a parent with child abuse for smoking within the vicinity of a child?

Because, whether a lifetime smoker, or someone who has just picked up the habit, the attitude is always the same, “won’t happen to me.”  My dad smoked with half of his lung removed for lung cancer, and through his chemo and radiation therapy until the day he died, still in denial, “I didn’t think it would happen to me.”  Parents have many rights with their children, but subjecting them to something so toxic, and deadly, is not one of them.  So unfortunately, we now have laws created to protect our children.  Of course that does not mean that they law will be enforced, or even prevent a parent from smoking in the car with a baby (of course the window was open to allow the smoke to exit the car – because there is no way that any smoke reached the back seat…right?).

I will not sugar coat it.  Smoking in front of a child, is two forms of child abuse.  Physical because the child is exposed to the second hand smoke which will put the child at risk for lung cancer in the future.  Emotional, because our children are taught that smoking kills.  My daughters know that their grandfather died directly from smoking.  Imagine how upset they are when they see even a stranger smoking a cigarette, a cigar, pipe, or vaping.  My daughters have seen first hand, that people die from smoking.  And I will not just limit it to the car either, because even if you are at an outdoor picnic, on a porch, anywhere you can smell a cigarette (or any other product), that means you are breathing it in.  Just because they are not in the direct stream of the smoke, does not mean that they are not being exposed to it.

car7

We should not need a law to protect children from smoking.  But we do need to protect our children who have no say when they are exposed to something so deadly and addictive.  Exposing children to second hand smoke is child abuse.

Co-parents Who Get It


coparenting4

Divorce is never going to be easy.  Two normal people do not get married with the intention of getting divorced.  But circumstances happen, situations change.  The inability to deal with those changes are normally what will lead to the divorce.  And if the process of divorce were perfect, in other words, both spouses were willing to talk rationally, responsibly, and honestly, throughout the process, then of course, there probably would not have been any need for the divorce if they already possessed this ability to communicate.  And when it is one spouse against another, the pitch of conversations is commonly tame, than when children are involved with the divorce process.

coparenting3

But why should a couple without children, work through a divorce differently, than a couple who has children?  I mean, besides the obvious, the children.  Both spouses will have to discuss assets.  And in theory, take the children out of the equation, those same parents would be in the same situation as the non-children couple.  What is it, that triggers a spouse, in a divorce to react in a more extreme manner for revenge (no matter what caused the marriage to fail)?  If the marriage failed because of money – a couple without children will settle the divorce even with a bitter spouse.  But with children, no matter the reason for the divorce, a spouse would be expected to be bitter, yet the non-children couple will not seek the revenge that a couple dealing with custody issues would face.  What is it exactly about children in a marriage that allows, promotes, and encourages a parent in the middle of a divorce to believe that divorcing a spouse means you divorce your children, also referred to as parental alienation?

coparenting5

We can all agree, that recipient of divorce papers would be considered normal, if they were upset.  One person finally has enough of a situation, and reluctantly files for divorce, may not have the level of emotion being dealt with by the spouse who received the divorce papers.  And in time, those feelings under normal circumstances will subside.  No, the pain does not go away, but it should not escalate.  Spouses without children, potentially have no reason to ever see or hear of each other again.  Parents will see each other for the rest of their lives.

A divorce is just that, between spouses.  But parents do not divorce.  But there is an extra step or two involved in the divorce process, that in the perfect world should not be necessary.  Parents do not divorce.  Mother will always be mother, and Father will always be father.  Both are equal and should have equal time, should still maintain a unified goal with the schooling, faith building, protection, and of course, memory sharing.

coparenting2

When one parent has the child (or children), unless it is a special event (such as confirmation, graduation), the parent not having time with the child, clearly will lose opportunities for memories.  There are likelihoods that birthdays will be missed, school functions, extracurricular events, and other achievements will be missed by at least one parent.

I chose to write this post after seeing a Facebook post by someone that I know personally.  She had gone through a divorce in recent years.  I do not know the particulars as to what caused the divorce, nor is it any of my business.  But there are ties between our families that leave me with an interest with the children.  But I saw a photo posted, not one that was taken by the parent without the custody of the child, but by the parent had the current custody of the child, and actually shared it with the other parent.  This is not the first time I have seen this.  I have a friend locally who also lives quite a distance from his children, and he also gets photos of his children, when he is not able to be with them.

I know nothing of their custody agreements, and I will not speak personally about mine.  But if you look at a typical custody agreement, other than the actual visitations, there are clauses that just seem plain sad, that often need to be put on paper, but clearly do not belong.

coparenting1

What does it say to a parent, about a parent, that it needs to be put in writing, to:

*  share photos

*  make sure the other parent is included in medical decisions

*  involve the other parent in educational evaluations and issues

*  allow uninhibited communications between children and both parents

*  prevent a hostile environment towards the other parent, especially by others

Seriously, what is it about children in the divorce process, that makes them a part of the process?  Look at the above “recommendations.”  To see them on paper is inflammatory, and they are implied by the very system that claims to want to protect the rights of the children.  If you have to have these written into an agreement, then clearly, you suspect there is going to be a problem with one parent complying.  And instead of dealing with that as the issue, the ability to co-parent willingly, the child often will get caught in the tug-of-war between one parent who just wants to co-parent, and the other parent who only wants to get even for filing for the divorce.  The crazy thing is, there is no reason ever, for seeking revenge for filing for divorce, especially at the expense of a child.  If you dig deep for the root cause, there will almost always be a mutual cause, whether or not the other spouse acknowledges it is the issue.  And it has nothing to do with the children.  Why make it their problem?

There will always be a “cheering” section giving their “professional advice.”  And because they may be closer to the vengeful parent, that parent will clearly believe what they are saying, because it is being reinforced, that they are doing the right thing.  But that gallery also has no interest in what is best for the children.  They are only on the side of revenge-seeking spouse.  And their comments will only be directed as such.

Children have no role in the divorce process itself.  To keep a child from a parent for no reason or cause between that child and the parent, is called alienation.  Parental alienation is child abuse.  It is time that is taken away from not only the parent affected, but more importantly, the child who is almost never given a voice, will grow up devastated.  And that time can never be replaced.

coparenting6

When you are divorced, you no longer have to be husband and wife.  But if you have children between you, you still have to be the mother and the father.  And no one outside of the immediate family, the children and the mother and father should have anything to say about it.

Post Navigation