Paul's Heart

Life As A Dad, And A Survivor

Archive for the category “Bullying”

What The Ears Don’t See


text3

I have always been one to believe in the importance of face to face communication.  Back before the internet (yes, I am exposing my age as a geezer), I would be most often be irritated with having a simple telephone conversation.  I always felt that the person on the other end of the phone line (for those of you have no knowledge of communications before wireless – these were cables that ran from house to house with big poles spaced about 200 feet apart from each other, carrying spoken noise from one talking receptacle to another), might not have been paying attention to me.  Or because of being a visual communicator, I may not have been able to get my sincerity across without someone being able to see it with their own ears, that I was serious.

text4

But texting and social media have taken my communication issues to a whole new level of insecurity.  We now have an entire generation of people, who do not have social skills to hold a simple face to face conversation with someone.  Sure, they can care on a text or private message conversation, but in person, not very likely.

The problem with communication today, is that the typed word is just that, plan as the screen you read it on (it used to be as plain as the ink on the paper).  At least with a telephone, you could tell if someone was happy, sad, angry, confused… oh wait, yes, on the phone at least, you had the opportunity to straighten out a misunderstanding.

text1

But in these days of political correctness, misunderstandings can be carried to an entirely new level.  Both friendships and families have been torn apart by the lack of emotions understood by the simple typed messages.  And if there is any confusion, it is too late to do anything about it.  On the phone, you could immediately take back what you said, but by the time you start texting, “OMG, I did not mean it that way,” the recipient of the original text has already gone from 0 to 60mph with a response, and the discussion escalates in intensity.  Feelings get hurt.  Worse things are exchanged.  Relationships often end up ended.  I have experienced this several times in my life.

text5

To make matters worse, conversations held on social media such as Facebook and Twitter, have what are called “trolls”.  These are individuals who have nothing better to do, than to initiate situations of dissent, or people who are just plain miserable.  They look to cause trouble, and many are very good at it.  Hopefully, lists and pages that are infected with these trolls have good moderators who can weed these mean spirited people out before any real harm is done, to what otherwise might actually be a good source of information.

text2

I miss the days of face to face conversations.  I do think we have become to desensitized with the internet communications.  And I am certain that I have had my share of misunderstandings with things I have written or misunderstood.  I have a lot of friends who know me well enough, back before the internet, who are very quick to let me know if I am off my rocker with a comment, something that does not sound like it could have been written by me.  I call them my voices of reason.

I am far from politically correct.  I do not use racial slurs, accept all ethnicities, beliefs, and religions, and will never disrespect a woman.  But I also understand that there are people who were raised and taught to be bigoted.  I generally ignore those people.  And I do not normally get upset hearing someone refer to Asians referred to as “oriental” in spite of me having two daughters of Chinese descent.  I know that “oriental” is a style of rug, and I will not waste time trying to undo what people have been taught.

This is the problem that social media and the internet does not address, how to emote feelings with the typed words.  Sorry, emoticons and “feeling like…” at the end of a post do not count.  The internet has been a great source to communicate information, such as health stories, feel good stories, helping to find missing children, and especially news issues that we seem to have lost faith in actual news agencies to report without a political bias.

It would just be nice to have a normal conversation about something that mattered.  And if someone was upset about it, before the first “OMG are U friggin’ kidding me” is sounded, the issue could be clarified before things are said that go too far.

Co-parents Who Get It


coparenting4

Divorce is never going to be easy.  Two normal people do not get married with the intention of getting divorced.  But circumstances happen, situations change.  The inability to deal with those changes are normally what will lead to the divorce.  And if the process of divorce were perfect, in other words, both spouses were willing to talk rationally, responsibly, and honestly, throughout the process, then of course, there probably would not have been any need for the divorce if they already possessed this ability to communicate.  And when it is one spouse against another, the pitch of conversations is commonly tame, than when children are involved with the divorce process.

coparenting3

But why should a couple without children, work through a divorce differently, than a couple who has children?  I mean, besides the obvious, the children.  Both spouses will have to discuss assets.  And in theory, take the children out of the equation, those same parents would be in the same situation as the non-children couple.  What is it, that triggers a spouse, in a divorce to react in a more extreme manner for revenge (no matter what caused the marriage to fail)?  If the marriage failed because of money – a couple without children will settle the divorce even with a bitter spouse.  But with children, no matter the reason for the divorce, a spouse would be expected to be bitter, yet the non-children couple will not seek the revenge that a couple dealing with custody issues would face.  What is it exactly about children in a marriage that allows, promotes, and encourages a parent in the middle of a divorce to believe that divorcing a spouse means you divorce your children, also referred to as parental alienation?

coparenting5

We can all agree, that recipient of divorce papers would be considered normal, if they were upset.  One person finally has enough of a situation, and reluctantly files for divorce, may not have the level of emotion being dealt with by the spouse who received the divorce papers.  And in time, those feelings under normal circumstances will subside.  No, the pain does not go away, but it should not escalate.  Spouses without children, potentially have no reason to ever see or hear of each other again.  Parents will see each other for the rest of their lives.

A divorce is just that, between spouses.  But parents do not divorce.  But there is an extra step or two involved in the divorce process, that in the perfect world should not be necessary.  Parents do not divorce.  Mother will always be mother, and Father will always be father.  Both are equal and should have equal time, should still maintain a unified goal with the schooling, faith building, protection, and of course, memory sharing.

coparenting2

When one parent has the child (or children), unless it is a special event (such as confirmation, graduation), the parent not having time with the child, clearly will lose opportunities for memories.  There are likelihoods that birthdays will be missed, school functions, extracurricular events, and other achievements will be missed by at least one parent.

I chose to write this post after seeing a Facebook post by someone that I know personally.  She had gone through a divorce in recent years.  I do not know the particulars as to what caused the divorce, nor is it any of my business.  But there are ties between our families that leave me with an interest with the children.  But I saw a photo posted, not one that was taken by the parent without the custody of the child, but by the parent had the current custody of the child, and actually shared it with the other parent.  This is not the first time I have seen this.  I have a friend locally who also lives quite a distance from his children, and he also gets photos of his children, when he is not able to be with them.

I know nothing of their custody agreements, and I will not speak personally about mine.  But if you look at a typical custody agreement, other than the actual visitations, there are clauses that just seem plain sad, that often need to be put on paper, but clearly do not belong.

coparenting1

What does it say to a parent, about a parent, that it needs to be put in writing, to:

*  share photos

*  make sure the other parent is included in medical decisions

*  involve the other parent in educational evaluations and issues

*  allow uninhibited communications between children and both parents

*  prevent a hostile environment towards the other parent, especially by others

Seriously, what is it about children in the divorce process, that makes them a part of the process?  Look at the above “recommendations.”  To see them on paper is inflammatory, and they are implied by the very system that claims to want to protect the rights of the children.  If you have to have these written into an agreement, then clearly, you suspect there is going to be a problem with one parent complying.  And instead of dealing with that as the issue, the ability to co-parent willingly, the child often will get caught in the tug-of-war between one parent who just wants to co-parent, and the other parent who only wants to get even for filing for the divorce.  The crazy thing is, there is no reason ever, for seeking revenge for filing for divorce, especially at the expense of a child.  If you dig deep for the root cause, there will almost always be a mutual cause, whether or not the other spouse acknowledges it is the issue.  And it has nothing to do with the children.  Why make it their problem?

There will always be a “cheering” section giving their “professional advice.”  And because they may be closer to the vengeful parent, that parent will clearly believe what they are saying, because it is being reinforced, that they are doing the right thing.  But that gallery also has no interest in what is best for the children.  They are only on the side of revenge-seeking spouse.  And their comments will only be directed as such.

Children have no role in the divorce process itself.  To keep a child from a parent for no reason or cause between that child and the parent, is called alienation.  Parental alienation is child abuse.  It is time that is taken away from not only the parent affected, but more importantly, the child who is almost never given a voice, will grow up devastated.  And that time can never be replaced.

coparenting6

When you are divorced, you no longer have to be husband and wife.  But if you have children between you, you still have to be the mother and the father.  And no one outside of the immediate family, the children and the mother and father should have anything to say about it.

An Anticipated Reaction


So my post the other day (A Parent Who Gets ‘It’) received a lot of views.  And before I get to the meat of this post, I want to state clearly, that as a rule, I do not discuss my actual divorce process on this blog.  When I discuss issues, they are general, and overall, issues that I do have concerns about, not even just for my own sake, but for the sake of my children.

I have a couple of “fans” who often try to share their commentary on my blog, and only once have I allowed the comments to go through, and that was to make a point.  If you wish to make a comment to one of my posts, and it is constructive, even if it may have a negative meaning, I will allow it to go through on my blog.

But these “fans” have tried to post more than a dozen times to my blog, and it has been awhile.  And I have decided to post their comment right here, on an actual post.  I will admit that it will not be in its own entirety, because as I said, it is filled with a lot of inaccuracies and definitely not constructive.

Instead, the portion of the comment that I am going to share with you all, proved exactly my point, a reaction to only one side of a story.  These are their own words:

“You are the lowest slime of the earth. I hope you never get to see your children again.”

The writer decided to attack me, knowing only one side.  There were about five more sentences, and all were untruths that the writer decided to include.  The writer clearly missed the intent of my post.  My post was about doing what was in the best interests of the children, and the writer decided to instead turn their frustrations on me, knowing nothing about my own personal situation, and instead hopes that I never get to see my children again.

How much more ugly can one person get to wish permanent emotional harm on someone’s children?

So to the writer (and out of respect not to embarrass you I will not include your name or your very “cute” tag line), I have but one thing to say.

att_1406000512661186

My daughters love me and every day I tell them that I love them.   And to wish something as evil as you have done, only shows how much misery you must have had, or do have in your life and you feel the need to lash out at two beautiful little girls.  You are a sad and pathetic individual.  And, because the courts do not believe in alienating children from either parent, fortunately your wish will never be granted.

But I must say in conclusion, how crushed those in your life would be to know that you could wish someone so evil and hurtful on someone else.

Post Navigation